← Back to all One Page Business Stories

The rise and fall of Lululemon: what went wrong?

A $6B athleisure giant that dominated yoga pants now down 40% from peak — killed by baggy sweats and its own quality.

By The Numbers

$6.25B
peak revenue in 2021
$443M
mirror acquisition write-off
-40%
stock crash from peak

What They Nailed Early

Invented athleisure for mainstream America with premium four-way stretch fabrics that solved real problems. Built community-focused stores that created brand evangelists. Revenue rocketed from $353M to $3.3B between 2009-2019.

What Changed

Leadership chaos started with 2013 see-through pants scandal and founder's fat-shaming comments. Then they chased shiny objects — blowing $500M on Mirror fitness tech that flopped post-COVID. Meanwhile fashion shifted to loose fits and baggy styles, exactly what Lulu doesn't do. Competitors from Nike to hipster startups like Alo ate their lunch.

Where it Landed

Still huge but stalled. US same-store sales down 2%. Growth forecast slashed to 8-9%. Stock down 40% from peak. Betting everything on China expansion while the home market feels saturated and stale.

The Principles

1. 
Premium quality can become a trap. When your leggings last 8+ years, customers stop rebuying — durability kills repeat purchase velocity.
2. 
Don't chase trends outside your wheelhouse. The $500M Mirror bet was pure distraction from their core clothing business and cost them dearly.
3. 
Even dominant brands must evolve or die. When fashion shifted to loose fits, Lulu's form-fitting DNA became a liability they couldn't pivot from fast enough.

Builder's Takeaway

If you're building a premium brand, watch for:
• 
Product quality so good it kills repeat purchases (plan for slower cycles)
• 
Market saturation in your core geography before it's too late
• 
Fashion/trend shifts that make your entire DNA suddenly feel stale
Want the whole story? → Watch this on YouTube