Is Team PokerStars any good?

After watching ELKY donk off more money than I can count, I became curious if he and other "Team PokerStars" pros and amateurs are winning players. SharkScope.com allows me to see their tournament results:

Name	Games	Av. Profit	Av. Stake	Av. ROI	Total $
ElkY	14,396	-$12	$605	2%	-$171,518
Exclusive	426	-$136	$812	-7%	-$58,130
FossilMan	142	-$202	$771	-8%	-$28,731
Bill Chen	160	-$167	$654	-24%	-$26,650
Humberto B.	76	-$295	$490	-41%	-$22,403
JoeHachem	36	-$103	$618	35%	-$3,693
VictorRamdin	236	-$15	$694	-5%	-$3,458
NoMercy	50	-$42	$101	-26%	-$2,120
Wil Wheaton	223	-$1	$13	-5%	-$295
LadyMaverick	112	-$1	$215	-8%	-$166
Katja Thater	20	-$2	$17	-24%	-$47
LucaPagano	171	$N/A	$N/A	-13%	$N/A
John Duthie	131	$N/A	$N/A	-25%	$N/A
stevejpa	142	$1	$27	101%	$175
Money800	360	$2	$390	1%	$811
LeeNelsonP*	209	$18	$241	8%	$3,693
barryg1	125	$33	$1,639	0%	$4,036
Tom McEvoy	242	$27	$134	12%	$6,523

This only reflects tournaments and no cash game results.

Why is the supposed PokerStars All-Star team a bunch of net losers? From a PokerStars company standpoint, it's not a bad idea to have featured players be a bunch of donkeys. If the "best" are losing money in buckets, why wouldn't they give some of it to you? As a student of the game, this gang is a poor set of role models.

As for the biggest loser, Elky, he has a very interesting combination of postive ROI but a negative total profit. From what I've seen of his play, he's playing out of his class too often and opponents in those tougher games do a better job of exploiting his weaknesses. His play is questionable mainly due to multi-tabling up to 12 tables at a time such that he appears to not be doing much except playing his cards. At lower limits with weaker competition, that can work. But a $2,200 1-table SNG, no one is going to make enough obvious mistakes to his style anything but a losing proposition.

Word to the wise: Avoid Barry Greenstein and McEvoy and hope to land Bill Chen at your tournament table!